You are expected to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification in an objective manner based on testing, and to evaluate its impact on life, society and/or the environment.
You are expected to explain how the product/solution could be improved as a result of these evaluations.
Students are expected to evaluate their own performance at each stage of the design cycle and to suggest ways in which their performance could be improved.
Please Respond to the questions below for your evaluate stage.
a) How did you perform in each stage of the design cycle? What were your strengths and what were your weakness? How did you address your weekness? How did the results of testing help you? (100 words minimum)
b) How did the blog impact on them that used it? What were the strengths and weakness of using blogs for addressing your problem? (70 words minimum)
c)Which stage of the design cycle did you perform well and which stage did you perform poorly and what were your reasons? How did address those weakness as a student? (100 words Minimum)
d) Reflect on one the area of interaction: How does the blog created relate to the Area of interaction? What are the strengths and weakness of using blogs in the stated area of interaction? (100 words Minimum)
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Create Stage
0
• Has not reached standard of any descriptors below.
1-2
• The Blogging contains some features and reflections.
• Some techniques and skills in blogging have been used.
• Comments to the topic of discussion are brief and a few people have commented.
• The process journal provides minimal evidence that the plan has not been considered fully.
3-4
• The Blogging is of a good quality, covers most required content and contains appropriate features.
• The student demonstrates some ability in the use of blogging software tools.
• Comments to the topic of discussion are detailed and more people have commented.
• The process journal provides some evidence that the plan has been regularly followed and mentions any changes made to the plan and/or design if applicable.
5-6
• The Blogging competently includes material from all required areas and uses high quality features.
• The student demonstrates competent use of blogging techniques and tools
• Comments to the topic of discussion are thorough and related to the topic and different stakeholders have commented
• The process journal provides clear evidence that the plan has been consistently followed and gives reasons for any changes to the plan and/or design if applicable
• Has not reached standard of any descriptors below.
1-2
• The Blogging contains some features and reflections.
• Some techniques and skills in blogging have been used.
• Comments to the topic of discussion are brief and a few people have commented.
• The process journal provides minimal evidence that the plan has not been considered fully.
3-4
• The Blogging is of a good quality, covers most required content and contains appropriate features.
• The student demonstrates some ability in the use of blogging software tools.
• Comments to the topic of discussion are detailed and more people have commented.
• The process journal provides some evidence that the plan has been regularly followed and mentions any changes made to the plan and/or design if applicable.
5-6
• The Blogging competently includes material from all required areas and uses high quality features.
• The student demonstrates competent use of blogging techniques and tools
• Comments to the topic of discussion are thorough and related to the topic and different stakeholders have commented
• The process journal provides clear evidence that the plan has been consistently followed and gives reasons for any changes to the plan and/or design if applicable
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)